SWITCHING ON FLOWERS: TRANSIENT LEAFY INDUCTION REVEALS NOVEL ASPECTS OF FLOWER DEVELOPMENT IN ARABIDOPSIS

Citation:

Wagner, D, Meyerowitz E.  2011.  Switching on flowers: transient LEAFY induction reveals novel aspects of flower development in Arabidopsis. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2, Number 80

Abstract:

Developmental fate decisions in cell populations fundamentally depend on at least two parameters: a signal that is perceived by the cell and the intrinsic ability of the cell to respond to the signal. The same regulatory logic holds for phase transitions in the life cycle of an organism, for example the switch to reproductive development in flowering plants. Here we have tested the response of the monocarpic plant species Arabidopsis thaliana to a signal that directs flower formation, the plant-specific transcription factor LEAFY (LFY). Using transient steroid-dependent LEAFY (LFY) activation in lfy null mutant Arabidopsis plants, we show that the plant’s competence to respond to the LFY signal changes during development. Very early in the life cycle, the plant is not competent to respond to the signal. Subsequently, transient LFY activation can direct primordia at the flanks of the shoot apical meristem to adopt a floral fate. Finally, the plants acquire competence to initiate the flower-patterning program in response to transient LFY activation. Similar to a perennial life strategy, we did not observe reprogramming of all primordia after perception of the transient signal, instead only a small number of meristems responded, followed by reversion to the prior developmental program. The ability to initiate flower formation and to direct flower patterning in response to transient LFY upregulation was dependent on the known direct LFY target APETALA1 (AP1). Prolonged LFY or activation could alter the developmental gradient and bypass the requirement for AP1. Prolonged high AP1 levels, in turn, can also alter the plants’ competence. Our findings shed light on how plants can fine-tune important phase transitions and developmental responses.

Keywords: LEAFY, flower development, reproductive competence

Notes:

NA

Related External Link

LATE MERISTEM IDENTITY2 ACTS TOGETHER WITH LEAFY TO ACTIVATE APETALA1

Citation:

Pastore, JJ, Limpuangthip A, Yamaguchi N, Wu MF, Sang Y, Han SK, Malaspina L, Chavdaroff N, Yamaguchi A, Wagner D.  2011.  LATE MERISTEM IDENTITY2 acts together with LEAFY to activate APETALA1, Aug. Development. 138:3189-98., Number 15

Abstract:

The switch from producing vegetative structures (branches and leaves) to producing reproductive structures (flowers) is a crucial developmental transition that significantly affects the reproductive success of flowering plants. In Arabidopsis, this transition is in large part controlled by the meristem identity regulator LEAFY (LFY). The molecular mechanisms by which LFY orchestrates a precise and robust switch to flower formation is not well understood. Here, we show that the direct LFY target LATE MERISTEM IDENTITY2 (LMI2) has a role in the meristem identity transition. Like LFY, LMI2 activates AP1 directly; moreover, LMI2 and LFY interact physically. LFY, LMI2 and AP1 are connected in a feed-forward and positive feedback loop network. We propose that these intricate regulatory interactions not only direct the precision of this crucial developmental transition in rapidly changing environmental conditions, but also contribute to its robustness and irreversibility.

Notes:

Pastore, Jennifer JLimpuangthip, AndreaYamaguchi, NobutoshiWu, Miin-FengSang, YiHan, Soon-KiMalaspina, LaurenChavdaroff, NatashaYamaguchi, AyakoWagner, Doris5-T32-HD007516/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/EnglandCambridge, EnglandDevelopment. 2011 Aug;138(15):3189-98.

LEAFY TARGET GENES REVEAL FLORAL REGULATORY LOGIC, CIS MOTIFS, AND A LINK TO BIOTIC STIMULUS RESPONSE

Citation:

Winter, CM, Austin RS, Blanvillain-Baufume S, Reback MA, Monniaux M, Wu MF, Sang Y, Yamaguchi A, Yamaguchi N, Parker JE, Parcy F, Jensen ST, Li H, Wagner D.  2011.  LEAFY Target Genes Reveal Floral Regulatory Logic, cis Motifs, and a Link to Biotic Stimulus Response, Apr 19. Dev Cell. 20:430-43., Number 4


Abstract:

The transition from vegetative growth to flower formation is critical for the survival of flowering plants. The plant-specific transcription factor LEAFY (LFY) has central, evolutionarily conserved roles in this process, both in the formation of the first flower and later in floral patterning. We performed genome-wide binding and expression studies to elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which LFY executes these roles. Our study reveals that LFY directs an elaborate regulatory network in control of floral homeotic gene expression. LFY also controls the expression of genes that regulate the response to external stimuli in Arabidopsis. Thus, our findings support a key role for LFY in the coordination of reproductive stage development and disease response programs in plants that may ensure optimal allocation of plant resources for reproductive fitness. Finally, motif analyses reveal a possible mechanism for stage-specific LFY recruitment and suggest a role for LFY in overcoming polycomb repression.

Notes:

1878-1551 (Electronic)1534-5807 (Linking)Journal Article

Related External Link

THE STEM CELL–CHROMATIN CONNECTION

Citation:

Sang, Y, Wu MF, Wagner D.  2009.  The stem cell–chromatin connection, Dec. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 20:1143-8., Number 9


Abstract:

Stem cells self-renew and give rise to all differentiated cell types of the adult body. They are classified as toti-, pluri- or multi-potent based on the number of different cell types they can give rise to. Recently it has become apparent that chromatin regulation plays a critical role in determining the fate of stem cells and their descendants. In this review we will discuss the role of chromatin regulators in maintenance of stem cells and their ability to give rise to differentiating cells in both the animal and plant kingdom. We will highlight similarities and differences in chromatin-mediated control of stem cell fate in plants and animals. We will consider possible reasons why chromatin regulators play a central role in pluripotency in both kingdoms given that multicellularity evolved independently in each.

Notes:

Sang, YiWu, Miin-FengWagner, DorisResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch Support, U.S. Gov’t, Non-P.H.S.EnglandSeminars in cell & developmental biologySemin Cell Dev Biol. 2009 Dec;20(9):1143-8. Epub 2009 Sep 16.

THE MICRORNA-REGULATED SBP-BOX TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SPL3 IS A DIRECT UPSTREAM ACTIVATOR OF LEAFY, FRUITFULL, AND APETALA1

Citation:

Yamaguchi, A, Wu MF, Yang L, Wu G, Poethig RS, Wagner D.  2009.  The microRNA-regulated SBP-Box transcription factor SPL3 is a direct upstream activator of LEAFY, FRUITFULL, and APETALA1, Aug. Dev Cell. 17:268-78., Number 2

Abstract:

When to form flowers is a developmental decision that profoundly impacts the fitness of flowering plants. In Arabidopsis this decision is ultimately controlled by the induction and subsequent activity of the transcription factors LEAFY (LFY), FRUITFULL (FUL), and APETALA1 (AP1). Despite their central importance, our current understanding of the regulation of LFY, FUL, and AP1 expression is still incomplete. We show here that all three genes are directly activated by the microRNA-targeted transcription factor SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE 3 (SPL3). Our findings suggest that SPL3 acts together with other microRNA-regulated SPL transcription factors to control the timing of flower formation. Moreover, the identified SPL activity defines a distinct pathway in control of this vital developmental decision.

Notes:

R01 GM051893/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United StatesJournal ArticleResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov’tResearch Support, U.S. Gov’t, Non-P.H.S.United States

Related External Link

FLOWER MORPHOGENESIS: TIMING IS KEY

Citation:

Wagner, D.  2009.  Flower morphogenesis: timing is key, May. Dev Cell. 16:621-2., Number 5

Abstract:

Flowers are unique parts of plants because they form a predictable number of organs of defined identity. This exquisite regularity defines entire plant families and has been used for taxonomic classification since ancient times. In this issue of Developmental Cell, Liu et al. reveal that timing of the onset of flower differentiation is key for the stereotypic architecture of flowers.

Notes:

CommentJournal ArticleUnited States

Related External Link

THE LEAFY FLORAL REGULATORS IN ANGIOSPERMS: CONSERVED PROTEINS WITH DIVERSE ROLES

Citation:

Moyroud, E, Tichtinsky G, Parcy F.  2009.  The LEAFY Floral Regulators in Angiosperms: Conserved Proteins with Diverse Roles. Journal of Plant Biology. 52, Number 177-185

Abstract:

Genetic analyses in model angiosperms have shown that the LEAFY/FLORICAULA transcription factor plays a central role in flower development. In Arabidopsis, LEAFY (LFY) triggers the development of floral meristems and controls their patterning through the activation of floral organ identity genes. Several recent reports enlighten the structure and function of this conserved protein but also illustrate the variety of roles it plays in different angiosperms.

Notes:

NA

Related External Link

THE CHROMATIN REMODELER SPLAYED REGULATES SPECIFIC STRESS SIGNALING PATHWAYS

Citation:

Walley, JW, Rowe HC, Xiao Y, Chehab EW, Kliebenstein DJ, Wagner D, Dehesh K.  2008.  The chromatin remodeler SPLAYED regulates specific stress signaling pathways, Dec. PLoS Pathog. 4:e1000237., Number 12


Abstract:

Organisms are continuously exposed to a myriad of environmental stresses. Central to an organism’s survival is the ability to mount a robust transcriptional response to the imposed stress. An emerging mechanism of transcriptional control involves dynamic changes in chromatin structure. Alterations in chromatin structure are brought about by a number of different mechanisms, including chromatin modifications, which covalently modify histone proteins; incorporation of histone variants; and chromatin remodeling, which utilizes ATP hydrolysis to alter histone-DNA contacts. While considerable insight into the mechanisms of chromatin remodeling has been gained, the biological role of chromatin remodeling complexes beyond their function as regulators of cellular differentiation and development has remained poorly understood. Here, we provide genetic, biochemical, and biological evidence for the critical role of chromatin remodeling in mediating plant defense against specific biotic stresses. We found that the Arabidopsis SWI/SNF class chromatin remodeling ATPase SPLAYED (SYD) is required for the expression of selected genes downstream of the jasmonate (JA) and ethylene (ET) signaling pathways. SYD is also directly recruited to the promoters of several of these genes. Furthermore, we show that SYD is required for resistance against the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea but not the biotrophic pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. These findings demonstrate not only that chromatin remodeling is required for selective pathogen resistance, but also that chromatin remodelers such as SYD can regulate specific pathways within biotic stress signaling networks.

Notes:

R01 GM064650-01/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United StatesT32 GM070377/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United StatesJournal ArticleResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch Support, U.S. Gov’t, Non-P.H.S.United States

Related External Link

HISTONE MODIFICATIONS AND DYNAMIC REGULATION OF GENOME ACCESSIBILITY IN PLANTS

Citation:

Pfluger, J, Wagner D.  2007.  Histone modifications and dynamic regulation of genome accessibility in plants, Dec. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 10:645-52., Number 6

Abstract:

In all eukaryotes chromatin physically restricts the accessibility of the genome to regulatory proteins such as transcription factors. Plant model systems have been instrumental in demonstrating that this restriction is dynamic and changes during development and in response to exogenous cues. Among the multiple epigenetic mechanisms that alter chromatin to regulate gene expression, histone modifications play a major role. Recent studies in Arabidopsis have provided the first genome-wide histone modification maps, revealed important biological roles for histone modifications, and advanced our understanding of stimulus-dependent changes in histone modifications.

Notes:

F32-GM076933/GM/United States NIGMSR01 GM064650-01A2/GM/United States NIGMSR01 GM64650-01/GM/United States NIGMSJournal ArticleResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch Support, U.S. Gov’t, Non-P.H.S.ReviewEngland

Related External Link